|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 6, 2015 19:40:58 GMT
MEM ML MEM U193.5 CHI ML IND ML
All of this is on the LowSpread ML system which worked fantastically until Late November last year.
Let's try it again and see what happens.
The Memphis totals is just a lot of ATS recommending this goes UNDER the total.
Let's see what happens.
No more than 1/2U plays.
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 7, 2015 19:01:28 GMT
Clean sweep. A perfect 4-0
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 7, 2015 21:38:55 GMT
October 7th
Low Spread ML System:(4-0)
Cleveland ML Cleveland O191 Miami ML Phoenix ML
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 7, 2015 22:45:45 GMT
Alright Sniper, here we go. Real funds tonight.
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 7, 2015 22:52:10 GMT
All bets are in. MIA -1.70 tad pricey but OK.
Good luck to us both.
|
|
|
Post by winson6628 on Oct 7, 2015 23:30:29 GMT
I'm with u guys!! Let's cash these tickets!!!
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 7, 2015 23:39:21 GMT
Game to watch: Miami Heat
I'll try and be on the shoutbox for most of it.
But I admit, I DO find BB hard to watch sometimes.
The worst burns I've ever had came when betting NBA.
18 (unanswered but for a FG) points in the final 8 minutes to come back for the hook.
Or the WORST one ever....was a totals...
I was good as long as each team scored 12 points in the 4th quarter (24 points), I was all set for the OVER.
Every time the home team got the ball, they went for the tre, missed, rebounded, and ran back up the court.
As I remember it, that team scored 4 points in the 4th quarter, and the other scored I think 16 or 18 or something like that.
As bad as those backdoor covers are in NFL/CFL/NCAAF.....somehow NBA is a whole different rollercoaster.
TENSE!!!
Can't wait to watch.
But all that said....lots of those stats had Lebron contributing....so I'm definitely nervous.
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 7, 2015 23:39:25 GMT
I'll be in the chat tonight again for at least part of the game.
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 7, 2015 23:41:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by winson6628 on Oct 7, 2015 23:57:52 GMT
Thank you r those links! I got u, let's have an awesome season and have sum fun!!
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 8, 2015 0:07:44 GMT
I can't wait till Smart Stats kicks in for NBA totals. Is it the Over or the Under? What game(s)? Hehe. Shhh.
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 8, 2015 1:21:30 GMT
No sweat Winson. And TMCG, what I REALLY wanna know is, can the SOS system knock it out of the park Jan-Late Feb again? We have all the dates, all the data, all the observations.
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 8, 2015 1:43:24 GMT
Why not. Except we all know PVI will have something too say about that. Last year to this year. Pole shifts. 3,600 years ago it went one way, 3,600 after that it flips the other way.
|
|
|
Post by tmcg on Oct 8, 2015 1:50:15 GMT
I am all in with everything we did last year.
Everything we did for last year was for this year. Smart Stats, SOS, time of season, all reports. Blue vs Red. O/U. And much more.
We can do this. We did it last year.
Slow and steady to start.
|
|
|
Post by ATS Staffwriter on Oct 8, 2015 2:16:01 GMT
I think PVI is good to match up with over-priced lines.
I think the way that weak teams beat strong teams is purely psychological.
Hungry vs Complacent.
I think when the PVI is showing a bottom 10 team with a significant advantage, and the line is set to low chalk for the top 10 team they're facing, I think that might be the time to strike.
Sometimes a high PVI means that a team is doing terribly and a loss should be expected.
But sometimes, a high PVI might indicate hunger.
If the books have reason to believe in that hunger, they'll put more action on the chalk by giving the chalk better odds. I have a 20-30 game sample on spread sheet on NHL traplines that would blow your mind. I forget who it was in the forums...but they got sick of me calling the crappiest teams to beat the best. They said it was luck and then I did it 4-5 more times back to back and I don't think we saw them again.
He cussed me out, cursed my luck, and found a new hobby.
|
|